Five principles for research ethics

April 19, 2016 – 12:17 am
Professional resume writing

Not that long ago, academicians were often cautious about airing the ethical dilemmas they faced in their research and academic work, but that environment is changing today. Psychologists in academe are more likely to seek out the advice of their colleagues on issues ranging from supervising graduate students to how to handle sensitive research data, says George Mason University psychologist June Tangney, PhD.

"There has been a real change in the last 10 years in people talking more frequently and more openly about ethical dilemmas of all sorts, " she explains.

Indeed, researchers face an array of ethical requirements: They must meet professional, institutional and federal standards for conducting research with human participants, often supervise students they also teach and have to sort out authorship issues, just to name a few.

Here are five recommendations APA's Science Directorate gives to help researchers steer clear of ethical quandaries:

1. Discuss intellectual property frankly

Academe's competitive "publish-or-perish" mindset can be a recipe for trouble when it comes to who gets credit for authorship. The best way to avoid disagreements about who should get credit and in what order is to talk about these issues at the beginning of a working relationship, even though many people often feel uncomfortable about such topics.

"It's almost like talking about money, " explains Tangney. "People don't want to appear to be greedy or presumptuous."

APA's Ethics Code offers some guidance: It specifies that "faculty advisors discuss publication credit with students as early as feasible and throughout the research and publication process as appropriate." When researchers and students put such understandings in writing, they have a helpful tool to continually discuss and evaluate contributions as the research progresses.

However, even the best plans can result in disputes, which often occur because people look at the same situation differently. "While authorship should reflect the contribution, " says APA Ethics Office Director Stephen Behnke, JD, PhD, "we know from social science research that people often overvalue their contributions to a project. We frequently see that in authorship-type situations. In many instances, both parties genuinely believe they're right." APA's Ethics Code stipulates that psychologists take credit only for work they have actually performed or to which they have substantially contributed and that publication credit should accurately reflect the relative contributions: "Mere possession of an institutional position, such as department chair, does not justify authorship credit, " says the code. "Minor contributions to the research or to the writing for publications are acknowledged appropriately, such as in footnotes or in an introductory statement."

The same rules apply to students. If they contribute substantively to the conceptualization, design, execution, analysis or interpretation of the research reported, they should be listed as authors. Contributions that are primarily technical don't warrant authorship. In the same vein, advisers should not expect ex-officio authorship on their students' work.

Source: www.apa.org

You might also like:

Ethics in Psychological Research
Ethics in Psychological Research
Ethics in Psychology
Ethics in Psychology
PSYCH-UNIT-1.4-ETHICS
PSYCH-UNIT-1.4-ETHICS
Ethics within Research
Ethics within Research
Research Ethics
Research Ethics
Research Ethics in Psychology
Research Ethics in Psychology
Lecture 2 Ethics in Psychological Research
Lecture 2 Ethics in Psychological Research
The ethics of exploiting psychological research in video
The ethics of exploiting psychological research in video ...
Research Ethics in Educational Psychology
Research Ethics in Educational Psychology

  • avatar What are the key ethical issues in psychological research and therapy?
    • All psychological research should be performed to the highest ethical standards. To ensure this all research undertaken under the auspices of the School of Psychology, by staff and students, must satisfy the ethical standards of the School

  • avatar Ethics in psychological research?
    • i don't have particular knowledge in this, but i think coercion and publishing the results with the students' names are the obvious ones.